- Joined
- Feb 24, 2021
- Messages
- 812
- Reaction score
- 1,642
- Age
- 23
- Country
I think this boils down to planners versus non-planners again. To use loaded words like genius or idiot in any capacity feels reductive.Everytime I get a snippet of Hokazono, I always leave thinking, "This guy is probably an idiot." I don't mean that in a meanspirited way, but he's very blunt about what he likes and what he wants to do. Kagurabachi is written very tightly and has strong foundations, but I do not sense any form of genius from any words that comes out of the author. It's like, everything he says, just screams, 'simpleminded'. Then again, I adhere to the philosophy that, "A smart man can solve a problem with a well-thought solution, a smarter man can solve the same problem with a thoughtless solution."
I remember reading some interviews on Akira Toriyama during his passing, and I also came to the same conclusion. "This guy is probably kind of stupid." No insult, honest. From his very first showing of Dragon Ball during the last volume of Arale (He said, "See you in Dragon Ball, if that even comes out" not knowing what a media juggernaut he was about to make), the various stories about how things changed and developed in Dragon Ball (He barely planned anything at all and winged it around his editor) or maybe why the movie was called "Dragon Ball Super: Super Hero" (He forgot the suffix was Dragon Ball Super and made a redundant title). Yeah, he literally molded an entire generation of humanity. But I don't think he had any ambition or desire to do any of that and was just winging his way through everything.
Toriyama has a deep understanding of what makes good manga, which was not a skill he was inherently born with. However, he also has a very loose creative processes. He likes to lets ideas develop organically, without much of a plan. Those are not mutually exclusive groups.
A lot of Toriyama's work appeals to the inner child in people, but that does not mean that Toriyama has the actual mind of a child, which is what this interpretation kind of implies. It's just his style.
.
And that interview with Hokazono kind of contradicts that interpretation anyway, since he clearly expresses that the story isn't instinctual to him, he is thinking very consciously about the style and flow, and he clearly has ambition to challenge himself and create something new.
He isn't really being blunt or simple-minded here, he's simply answering interview questions, isn't he?