It has nothing to do with different views, but what the people say and believe. Trump supporters are blind and biased because they believe a lot of his lies. How do I know they're lies? I fact check. Even sources biased towards Trump have admitted he has exaggerated a bit, like when he claimed he saw thousands of Muslims celebrate 9/11 (which is false). While I'm an anti-Trump, I still at least defend the idiot if I think there's something wrong said.You throw around bias towards anyone who offers a different view than you, just like many on the left and right. The words are said, but there is no weight to them. Both sides hate so much they don't care what ridiculous claims they make because they know millions of like minded people will echo them. I'm absolutely certain to the DNC, their followers and disgusting people like Merkel honestly (or maybe not even honestly) believe Trump ruined the image of our country, but I guess that's the price you pay for standing up against global corruption like the Clinton empire and an incompetent, retard like Merkel. Having a majority back you doesn't make you in the right either, but I guess people forget that.
No, a lot of people know Trump ruined the image of USA even more. We're literally the butt of jokes for having voted Trump, and it's his victory along with Brexit that prevented horrible people like LePen and May from winning. Because they knew the BS they'd get if someone like Trump came into power. And having the majority back me does make me in the right when it comes to claims like majority think Trump has hurt US and its image. I mean, the majority's opinions do make up our image.... And Trump standing up to global corruption when he himself is corrupt? Funny.
It's not disagreement. If he supported Trump, then whatever. If he thought Hillary deserved to be locked up, and CNN deserved to go out of business, then whatever. But if he spreads around hatred, then that's a problem.Anti-Semitic, racist etc are all "mean things" said. That's the problem here. People thought it was "wrong" and so they think they have the "right" to threaten, cry and take away his rights just because he's an asshole that never once said to hurt people for their skin color, religion or sexual orientation (except, as previously stated, Islamic terrorists who cares about that remark?). I'm asking what makes you and so many others think him saying things you* disagree with somehow grants you* the right to do this? It's absolutely asinine to me. Where does it stop if this is what it has come to? He didn't advocate for anything either, which if he actually had this wouldn't be a problem, but he didn't. If anyone thinks a meme of a fake wrestling is "advocating violence against CNN" they have issues they need to work out. And no, Kathy Griffin's moment was not out of "comedy" as opposed to a silly little meme. She shot that image for a magazine with a man known for his "shocking, edgy style" Tyler Shields. It was a message against Trump, not as a comedic "har har I beheaded him" stunt (though I'd have to wonder who would find that funny/not a clear threat but find a damn meme "promoting violence").
Just as the wrestling GIF was a message against CNN. It sort of advocating violence, especially when Trump has advocated violence against BLM and news reporters, if I recall correctly. I also fail to see how Kathy's picture is a threat. That's like saying the Trump attacking the CNN meme is threatening CNN.
I don't think a lot of people were thinking about what Kathy did (which isn't really that cruel or harsh if we compare it to worse stuff), or at least I don't remember anyone bringing it up, but I. And a lot of people actually did have an issue with what CNN did. At least, the left wingers I know did.I have yet to see anyone logically explain how a harmless meme created over a harmless, funny wrestling incident is "advocating violence" and I'm beginning to realize I never will. It makes absolutely no sense and sounds like some desperate attempt to liken the harshness and cruelty of what Kathy did to that meme when in reality they are worlds apart.
It is also apparent no one is going to stand up against what CNN did since so many people have no problem with it. Such a sad realization.
I'm saying that despite being anti-Trump and being a left wing, at least I admit the kid did nothing wrong when he made and shared the meme, and that CNN was being douchebag.Are you saying I don't admit to something here and if so, what? That doxxing, threatening or revoking a man's rights and liberties because he said insensitive stuff is "okay" just because it was hurtful? Or that what the crazy people on the right did for/against Obama was wrong? If the later, of course it was wrong, but someone else's actions do not make the actions of another any less wrong. For the former, nope, I won't admit to it because even if a billion people stand behind it it is still wrong to do it. I don't and never will advocate the existence of thought police.
*plural you here