- Joined
- Feb 15, 2013
- Messages
- 2,142
- Reaction score
- 1,307
- Gender
- Hidden
- Country
I wasn't just talking about you, but you can't deny that regardless of how long you deliberated over it, you had the impulse to type out the opinion and post it here. It's one thing to feel that way and to talk about it with people you know who aren't at-risk, but to publicly spread such a baseless idea in a thread for suicidal people? That makes absolutely no sense to me.This is not an impulse, it is a view based on limited knowledge as to my knowledge, many people who commit suicide do so because they don't want to face challenges anymore or because they give up instead of continuing to fight.
People don't choose their feelings. Of course, most of us can choose how to react to them to some extent, but not everyone is freely able to do so. Why are you so unwilling to consider that there can be numerous reasons (and probably the most powerful are physiological and social-- not just psychological) that people might struggle with managing their stress, and that suicidal people are among the most likely to suffer from more than one of those challenges to their well being? What do you lose if you give up the idea that some cases of people having suicidal thoughts have to be "cowardly?" Why it is so important for you to cling to beliefs that even you admit are poorly informed?
You already did... ??? Have you read the first post of this thread and considered the intended audience for this thread? Did you at least skim through and get a feel for kinds of posts it contains?People only feel worse if you tell them that. Why the hell would I mention that to anyone contemplating suicide? Anyone who does that is an idiot, honestly. Reasons aren't irrelevant, they're just as important because if not for those reasons, suicidal thoughts can cease. It's hard to help a suicidal person when you don't know what's going on with them. Obviously not that many people choose to feel suicidal. It's a shitty, horrible feeling where you feel no hope.
I was responding to your judgment of suicidal people as "cowardly" when I said their reasons were "irrelevant." There are no "good" or "bad" reasons for a person to be suicidal. It is completely absurd to form a moral ranking of people's reasons for wanting to end their own lives. The act of suicide in and of itself cannot have any kind of moral value assigned to it-- at least from a secular standpoint. (If any philosophy students here want to jump in with utilitarian/deontological/aretaic thoughts about this, please go for it.) In the context of helping suicidal people, of course situation-appropriate help is needed (as I believe I also mentioned above). That is exactly when reasons for people wanting to end their lives become relevant!
Nobody chooses to become suicidal. Please educate yourself on this. It's a logical fallacy to believe the popularity of an idea like "suicide is cowardly" makes it true.
I was speaking generally about the popular urge among many people to publicly repeat and thereby reinforce the blatantly false and dangerously stigmatizing stereotype that suicide is "cowardly" in my earlier post. (I've heard that sentiment so many times, I've become quite weary of it.) Anyway, since you're replying to me now, I'll address that post: Your statement wasn't clear at all. The word "coward" has established meanings-- including a strongly connoted moral judgment-- that aren't erased by your post. You could easily have clarified either that you meant to use an entirely different word (more appropriate to what you seem to want to say), or given an alternate *valid* sense of the word coward (in theory), but instead you completely changed it to mean something like "hopeless." However you also divorced the word "hope" from suicide (see below). That's a non-sequitur.I believe I made a clear enough statement what "cowardice" meant in my own view, so, I'm not going to go back to it.
Fair point that the perspective does not accomplish anything. But not every perception of a human being brings anything beyond the natural chain of thought out. What suicidal people need and how another human's way of thinking may or may not effect the person in question is of no concern, as far as the inherent value of the thought is considered.
I think what you meant is in fact "hopeless," or better, "despairing," not cowardly. To be a "coward" does not mean "unable to cling to anything," but to be "hopeless" or "despairing" can. But you also said in another post:Suicide is a way of dealing with things for someone, who is basically unable to cling to anything, a "coward". Cowardice here is not a literal meaning. It is what I call people that have their will to live blocked by other stuff, which might be trivial or significant.
Perhaps you might reconsider your rejection of the application of "hope(less)" here? You've been consistently describing hopelessness pretty well. You might want to decide if you're going to condemn suicidal people by calling them "cowardly," or if you want to speak of it as a tragedy by calling them "hopeless" or "despairing."I wouldn't bring the word "hope" into this context at all. And there are many people who commit suicide even when things are supposedly going their ways, so, it is indeed an ill-advised criteria, to begin with. I'd guess it's most likely due to the fear of status quo, that their lives won't ever be any different, and the things that are troubling them will never go away, is the factor that drives them into a corner, but it doesn't and it won't go beyond being a wild guess at best.
When someone generalizes about suicide without experiential knowledge or any regard to existing quantitative and qualitative empirical data and their "conclusion" is just to repeat the popular viewpoint based on scant second or third-hand anecdotal information, I think I can call that jumping to conclusions. In order not to be jumping to conclusions, you'd have to have either experienced it firsthand, experienced treating people for it, or read up on it at the very *least*.There is no such thing as not jumping to ill-informed conclusions. We are not talking specific people or their specific ways of thinking. We are, in fact, bound to make assumptions, and be wrong at them, so, I don't see what is there to be asked about.
Last edited: