Re: Japanese Learning Resources
ok, can someone help me, about this "nandayo", "ndayo", "nodayo" thing, it is kind of confusing
I assume you know what da yo means (the verb of existence? being? plus particle of emhpasis).
No, n, nan, nano (well, only "no" really) in this place of the sentence means explanatory tone. If it's a declarative sentence/answer, it carries the nuances of "I'm explaining" or maybe confirming. In a question, you're asking someone to explain/confirm. If you're attaching "no" to a noun or na-adj you have to add a "na" making it "nano". And in speech, the "no" gets shortened to "n" often as it's easier to pronounce. You also don't have to add the "desu"/"da" at the end, in declarative sentence not using "da" does sound kind of feminine.
明日は水曜日なの。 (Ashita wa suiyobi
na no - Tomorrow it's wednesday! [feminine explanatory undertone])
明日は水曜日なんだよ。(Ashita wa suiyobi
nan da yo - Tomorrow it's wednesday! [normal explanatory undertone])
外は寒いの。 (Soto wa samui
no - It's cold outside [feminine explanatory])
外は寒いんですよ。 (Soto wa samui
n da yo - It's cold outside [normal explanatory undertone])
I feel in many cases it doesn't really matter whether you use it or not, I mean saying
この先食べに行くんだよ。(Kono saki tabe ni iku n da yo - After this ends I'm going to go eat [explanatory tone])
or
この先食べに行くよ。 (Kono saki tabe ni iku yo - Same but without explanatory particle, just announcing)
- it doesn't really matter too much, it depends on the person who's saying it. If the person wants to add the nuance of "I'm explaining this to you!" then they will add it. In a polite question, it does hold the nuance of "please explain this", but in casual questions, "no" is actually used only to imply the question itself.
明日試合を見に行くんですか。(Ashita shiai wo mi ni iku n desu ka - Are you going to watch the match tomorrow? [polite inquiry, "ka" is the question marker])
明日試合を見に来るの? (Ashita shiai wo mi ni kuru no? - Coming to watch the match tomorrow? [casual question, "no" makes the question instead of "ka")
I'm sorry if I wrote something wrong or unclear