Turn me on to phantoms

[Doraku]

yeah

boring as fuck. no wonder he is undefeated. smart tactic though.

 

[xi0]

same

 

[Doraku]

gary are you a Star Wars guy or Trekkie?

 

[xi0]

I like both, but I would pick Star Wars

 

[Doraku]

Star Trek has better explanation about their world, but Star Wars is more fun.

Someone makes a theory about Star Wars plotline: http://www.starwarsringtheory.com/ a huge wall of text but I think it's pretty intriguing.

 

[xi0]

Star Trek has better explanation about their world, but Star Wars is more fun.

Someone makes a theory about Star Wars plotline: http://www.starwarsringtheory.com/ a huge wall of text but I think it's pretty intriguing.

Better explanation how? The world-building is just as large in SW as it is in ST.

 

[Doraku]

Like their how their gadget works?

 

[xi0]

Like their how their gadget works?

And there are a ton of schematics and lore behind the lightsabers and other SW stuff...?

 

[Doraku]

I mean the science-y stuff behind it. I know nothing about physics or rocket science, but I think Star Trek's technology is more well thought out.

 

[xi0]

I mean the science-y stuff behind it. I know nothing about physics or rocket science, but I think Star Trek's technology is more well thought out.

SW is more fantastical in nature, but I think there is just as much "nuts and bolts" to the universe as ST. Might be about different things, as ST might be more futuristic in nature. The original trilogy could probably be described as classic fantasy, just that it takes place in outer space. But SW's world building is just as, if not more complex than ST's.

 

[benelori]

Science-y nuts and bolts are frequent in space battles or whenever flying...the Millenium Falcon is often described in detail, cuz when it breaks (and if often does ) they describe why and how it can be fixed and it's a general truth for other vehicles too...there are others too, but this is the most frequent

But the most time is spent with the Force, so the nuts and bolts are mainly 'spiritual' in nature I guess

 

[xi0]

Science-y nuts and bolts are frequent in space battles or whenever flying...the Millenium Falcon is often described in detail, cuz when it breaks (and if often does ) they describe why and how it can be fixed and it's a general truth for other vehicles too...there are others too, but this is the most frequent

But the most time is spent with the Force, so the nuts and bolts are mainly 'spiritual' in nature I guess

Nuts and bolts nonetheless

 

[benelori]

Nuts and bolts nonetheless

Never said otherwise

 

[gnut]

http://releasedatecars2016.com/2016-pontiac-trans-review-specs/

tell me that girl ain't sweet

 

[xi0]

http://releasedatecars2016.com/2016-pontiac-trans-review-specs/

tell me that girl ain't sweet

Pontiac? Since when do they make them anymore? lol

Idk, I'm not a fan of a lot of the modern "muscle car" looks. I like the Dodge Challenger looks, but Dodge's are shit cars.

 

[gnut]

Its limited if i read correctly...you dont tbink its hotter than the challenger.
my oldest boy has one...not to impressive compared to a TA.

 

[xi0]

Its limited if i read correctly...you dont tbink its hotter than the challenger.
my oldest boy has one...not to impressive compared to a TA.

I don't care about the legacy, I think the Challenger is the best-looking compared to the other "retro-look" muscle cars that have come out in recent history. I might have put the Mustang ahead a while ago, but the newer Mustangs look like knock-off Aston Martin Vanquish or something.

The TA looks too much like the Camaro, which I'm not a fan of.

 

[Faust]

How about s[highlight]CAR[/highlight]ra?

---------- Post added at 09:25 AM ---------- Previous post was at 09:24 AM ----------

It's a car joke. That's why it's CARny.

Okay I'll stop.

---------- Post added at 09:26 AM ---------- Previous post was at 09:25 AM ----------

 

[xi0]

oh

 

[Faust]

You're a car enthusiast Gary?