- Joined
- Feb 10, 2016
- Messages
- 2,250
- Reaction score
- 3,685
- Country
Can you not comprehend context at all? I was looking at it from your view point, Gajeel stomps Bradman in DF yet Bradman is stronger? I WANT YOU to explain that since you claim Bradman was stronger despite Gajeel bodying him.Curious about what?
Are you trying to tell me that Gajeel mops the floor with Bradman?
Seriously, I can accept that you vote Natsu in this thread, but if you think that Gajeel can mop the floor with Bradman, then I don't think we are reading the same manga anymore.
Your very statement contradicts itself:
"Gajeel literally mops the floor with him while using no actual Dragon Slaying moves but Bradman is stronger"
See how this doesn't make sense?
How can you say "Gajeel literally mops the floor with him" in the exact same sentence that you say "but Bradman is stronger"??
That in itself is a contradiction. It's either one or the other.
No, that's not correct.
First of all, you can't change the rules on us. The battle already started, so there are no changing the rules.
If you wanted to make rules, you should have done it at the very beginning.
Secondly, I'll quote what Holt says here:
"Basically, reasonable speculation is intended for feats that haven't yet been shown but can be inferred going by canon material."
Now, I don't see anything in this statement that does not fit the criteria for us to powerscale Gildartz the way we want to.
Gildartz has not shown feats yet, but he does have canon material to back him up.
It is canon that Gildartz has beaten Natsu 2 times.
One by making Natsu surrender. And the other by one punch.
From those, we can infer that Gildartz is still superior to Natsu.
--- Double Post Merged, , Original Post Date: ---
THANK YOU.His sentence is a contradiction, but it is sarcasm. He's saying that Gajeel mops the floor with Bradman and quotes you saying G>B. Thus contradiction. He's not saying G>B, he's actually denying it
--- Double Post Merged, ---
I have voted against Gildarts when he fought both Wahl and Gray. This tournament has no value or Gildarts would be out and Jacob would have beat Mard Geer.I just read something very interesting, and reminiscent of what i personally said as well about Natsu.
Alright i want to know you guys' opinion about it: Gildarts in this tournament defeated Wahl, Gray as well as some guys from Group A (where he finished 1 vote away from Jellal's first place).
You guys claiming that Gildarts can't be Spriggan level and that we can't speculate because rules blabla. Can you guys explain me how this tournament can remain credible if Gildarts beats Wahl in quarterfinals, whereas in semifinals he is said to NOT be Spriggan level.
We should definitely all agree that Gildarts is, in fact, Spriggan level. Whether or not you agree, we all have to accept it. If you guys don't agree with it you're basically saying all previous round have no value and this whole tournament has no value.
The majority of people voted Gildarts over Wahl is what it means. In this tournament, Gildarts beated a Spriggan 1v1. He beated Gray as well. Now Natsu can be stronger and i won't disagree with it, but at the very least, let's not say Gildarts isn't relevant blabla. He beated Gray AND Wahl and that has been decided by us all.